Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth C. Waller
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kenneth C. Waller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO, no significant coverage of this individual. Also could come under WP:ONEEVENT and/or WP:NOTNEWS. Tassedethe (talk) 23:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BLP1E as any notability he has, which is very limited, derives from a single event in the war in Afghanistan. This could also be considered an attack page. Cullen328 (talk) 04:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The single reference provided, which purports to be a Los Angeles Times article, is actually a dead link to a page on a website called "Crimes of War", which I doubt is a reliable source. Cullen328 (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Anotherclown (talk) 06:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Anotherclown (talk) 06:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Any notability belongs to the event (which is unclear) not the person. Nick-D (talk) 07:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - subject appears to lack significant coverage in reliable sources and is therefore not notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 07:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per reasons given above. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: due lack of significant coverage per WP:GNG. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.